ADR-0005: Use iron-session for authentication instead of NextAuth/Clerk/Supabase Auth

Context and Problem Statement

Scrum4Me requires username/password login without email verification, a synchronous demo-user check on every request, and full control over the session cookie shape (including an isDemo flag). Which authentication solution fits these constraints at minimal complexity?

Decision Drivers

No email required — username/password only.
Demo-user policy (ADR-0006) requires a synchronous isDemo check in both middleware and server actions.
No third-party redirect chain — auth must stay in-process.
Solo-developer project: minimal external dependencies preferred.

Considered Options

NextAuth / Auth.js v5
Clerk
Supabase Auth
iron-session + bcryptjs

Decision Outcome

Chosen option: iron-session + bcryptjs, because it is the only option that gives us full control over cookie contents, has zero external redirect dependency, and lets us embed isDemo directly in the session payload.

Consequences

Good, because session structure is fully controlled — we add any field we need.
Good, because no external service dependency for auth; works offline and in CI.
Good, because synchronous cookie read in proxy.ts middleware is trivial.
Bad, because we own the password hashing, session rotation, and CSRF protection.
Bad, because no OAuth/social login without building it ourselves.

Confirmation

lib/session.ts defines the session type. docs/patterns/iron-session.md documents the pattern. Any new field on the session object must be added to the type there.

Pros and Cons of the Options

NextAuth / Auth.js v5

Good, because OAuth, email magic links, and credentials all in one library.
Bad, because credentials provider is discouraged in v5; session shape is opaque.
Bad, because adding isDemo to the JWT requires custom callbacks.

Clerk

Good, because fully managed, beautiful UI, no session code to maintain.
Bad, because requires third-party redirect; adds external dependency.
Bad, because demo-user policy would require custom session metadata sync.

Supabase Auth

Good, because integrates with Supabase storage (but we use Neon).
Bad, because username/password without email is not the primary use case.
Bad, because adds a second database dependency just for auth.

iron-session + bcryptjs

Good, because minimal, explicit, and TypeScript-native.
Good, because session payload is a plain object we fully control.
Neutral, because we write our own password logic (bcrypt makes it safe).

More Information

See docs/patterns/iron-session.md for implementation details. Revisit if multi-tenant or SSO requirements emerge.

2.8 KiB Raw Permalink Blame History