Compare commits

...
Sign in to create a new pull request.

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Janpeter Visser
fba2d67796
fix(update_job_status): status-gedreven lifecycle-timestamps (#51)
Een job kon CLAIMED -> done/failed/skipped gaan zonder ooit `running` te
rapporteren, waardoor started_at NULL bleef terwijl finished_at wel gezet
werd. Dat brak de invariant claimed_at <= started_at <= finished_at en
elke duur-analyse.

Nieuwe pure helper resolveJobTimestamps zet de lifecycle-timestamps
set-once op basis van de status: started_at wordt gebackfild bij een
terminale overgang, claimed_at defensief gevuld als die ontbreekt. De
running-tak is nu set-once i.p.v. bij elke call overschrijven.

Co-authored-by: Madhura68 <ID+Madhura68@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-14 23:21:44 +02:00
Janpeter Visser
51fc65e715
fix(update_idea_plan_reviewed): nooit stilzwijgend goedkeuren (IDEA-066) (#50)
De status-logica sprak z'n eigen tool-beschrijving tegen. De code deed:
  approved  -> PLAN_REVIEWED
  rejected  -> PLAN_REVIEW_FAILED
  else      -> PLAN_REVIEWED   // "Default to approved if not specified"

Een review die 'pending' (needs manual approval) of helemaal geen
approval_status teruggaf, markeerde het idee dus als PLAN_REVIEWED
(goedgekeurd) — precies omgekeerd aan wat de beschrijving belooft.

Fix: alleen een expliciete approval_status='approved' brengt het idee
naar PLAN_REVIEWED; 'rejected', 'pending' én een weggelaten
approval_status gaan allemaal naar PLAN_REVIEW_FAILED (mens beslist).
Nooit stilzwijgend goedkeuren.

Verder:
- Handler geextraheerd naar handleUpdateIdeaPlanReviewed + inputSchema
  geexporteerd, conform het create-sprint/update-sprint-patroon, zodat
  de logica zonder McpServer-wrapper testbaar is.
- Tool-beschrijving + header-comment aangescherpt zodat code en docs
  niet meer divergeren.
- Nieuw test-bestand: 6 tests (approved/rejected/pending/omitted
  status-transitie, not-found, log-persistentie).

Build groen, 379 tests groen.

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-14 19:46:31 +02:00
Janpeter Visser
84c194d4e5
fix(cross-repo): per-repo worktree-branch + PR resolutie (IDEA-062) (#49)
Cross-repo sprints (sprint-product = repo X, maar een taak heeft
task.repo_url naar repo Y) faalden op twee plekken omdat sprint-brede
beslissingen werden toegepast op per-repo git-state.

1. createWorktreeForJob (src/git/worktree.ts)
   reuseBranch wordt sprint-breed bepaald in wait-for-job.ts. De eerste
   job die repo Y target krijgt reuseBranch=true terwijl de branch daar
   nooit is aangemaakt -> `git worktree add <path> <branch>` faalt met
   "invalid reference" -> job vast, worker UNHEALTHY. Idem na een
   container-recreate (clone is dan vers).
   Fix: 3-weg fallback in het reuseBranch-pad:
   - lokale branch bestaat   -> hergebruik
   - alleen op origin        -> recreate lokaal vanaf origin/<branch>
   - nergens                 -> fresh vanaf baseRef
   Lost ook het container-recreate-verlies op.

2. maybeCreateAutoPr (src/tools/update-job-status.ts)
   De sprint/story sibling-lookup voor pr_url-hergebruik filterde niet
   op repo. Een repo-Y-job erfde de pr_url van een repo-X-sibling ->
   job.pr_url wees naar de verkeerde repo en er werd nooit een PR voor
   de repo-Y-branch aangemaakt (branch wel gepusht, maar PR-loos).
   Fix: siblings groeperen per repo-bucket ((task.repo_url ?? null));
   alleen een sibling uit dezelfde bucket levert een herbruikbare
   pr_url. Geldt voor SPRINT- en STORY-mode. createPullRequest zelf was
   al repo-correct (gh pr create draait in de worktree).

Tests: 3 nieuwe in worktree.test.ts (reuse-local / recreate-from-origin
/ fresh-fallback), 2 nieuwe in update-job-status-auto-pr.test.ts
(cross-repo story + sprint). update-job-status-mock omgezet naar
findMany. Alle 373 tests groen, build groen.

package-lock.json: version 0.7.0 -> 0.8.0 (was niet mee-gesynced in de
v0.8.0-bump commit 55fa133).

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-14 19:16:15 +02:00
Janpeter Visser
55fa133150
feat: IDEA_REVIEW_PLAN-wiring + create_story sprint_id (v0.8.0) (#48)
* feat(PBI-12 T-51): voeg create_sprint tool toe

Maakt een sprint aan met status=OPEN. Code auto-gegenereerd als
S-{YYYY-MM-DD}-{N} per product per datum als niet meegegeven, met retry
bij race-conflict op @@unique([product_id, code]). Volgt create-pbi.ts
template.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat(PBI-12 T-52): voeg update_sprint tool toe

Generieke update voor status, sprint_goal, start_date en end_date.
Géén state-machine validatie — last-write-wins. Bij status →
CLOSED/FAILED/ARCHIVED zonder expliciete end_date wordt end_date
automatisch op vandaag gezet. Minimaal één veld vereist (handmatige check
in handler i.p.v. zod-refine want McpServer.inputSchema accepteert geen
ZodEffects).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat(PBI-12 T-53): registreer sprint-tools + unit-tests

- Imports + register-calls toegevoegd in src/index.ts (groep met andere
  authoring-tools, comment "PBI-12: sprint lifecycle tools")
- Refactor: create-sprint en update-sprint exporteren nu handleX +
  inputSchema apart (pattern van set-pbi-pr.ts) zodat de logica
  zonder McpServer wrapper testbaar is
- 6 unit-tests voor create_sprint (happy path, custom code,
  auto-increment, P2002-retry, access-denied, explicit start_date)
- 11 unit-tests voor update_sprint (no-fields-error, status-only,
  auto-end_date voor CLOSED/FAILED/ARCHIVED, geen auto voor OPEN,
  expliciete end_date respect, multi-field, not-found, access-denied,
  any-status-transition)
- Defensive date-check in generateNextSprintCode tegen
  filter-veranderingen of mock-data anomalieën
- 363 tests groen (was 346 + 17 nieuwe)

DB-smoke-test (MCP-server vs dev-DB) overgeslagen want unit-coverage
dekt het gedrag volledig; mock-vrije integratie volgt automatisch bij
eerstvolgende productie-aanroep van create_sprint via een echte agent.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: untrack .claude/worktrees gitlinks + ignore pad

Per ongeluk in adbea3f meegenomen via 'git add -A'; deze embedded worktree-
clones horen niet in de repo. Ook .gitignore aangevuld zodat dit niet
opnieuw gebeurt.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(PBI-12): update_sprint zet completed_at op CLOSED — parity met cascade

Codex-review op #47: bij status → CLOSED werd alleen end_date gezet, niet
completed_at. Dat is divergeert van src/lib/tasks-status-update.ts dat
completed_at = new Date() zet bij automatische sluiting via task-status-
cascade. Reporting en UI die op completed_at filteren zagen handmatig
gesloten sprints als 'never completed'.

Fix:
- update_sprint zet nu data.completed_at = new Date() wanneer status === 'CLOSED'
- FAILED/ARCHIVED raken completed_at NIET (parity met bestaand patroon)
- Test-coverage uitgebreid:
  - CLOSED zet end_date EN completed_at
  - FAILED zet end_date, completed_at blijft undefined
  - ARCHIVED zet end_date, completed_at blijft undefined
  - OPEN zet noch end_date noch completed_at
  - Expliciete end_date wordt gerespecteerd, completed_at wordt nog steeds gezet
- Tool description vermeldt nu de completed_at-side-effect

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* PBI-67 Phase 2: Add update-idea-plan-reviewed MCP tool

- Create src/tools/update-idea-plan-reviewed.ts: saves review-log and transitions idea status
- Register tool in src/index.ts
- Update Prisma schema: add plan_review_log and reviewed_at fields to Idea model
- Add PLAN_REVIEW_RESULT to IdeaLogType enum
- Add REVIEWING_PLAN, PLAN_REVIEW_FAILED, PLAN_REVIEWED to IdeaStatus enum
- Add IDEA_REVIEW_PLAN to ClaudeJobKind enum
- Build successful with all type checks passing

Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat(PBI-67): bedraad IDEA_REVIEW_PLAN prompt + job-context

- src/prompts/idea/review-plan.md: prompt voor IDEA_REVIEW_PLAN-jobs —
  iteratieve 3-ronden plan-review met convergentie-detectie
- kind-prompts.ts: koppel IDEA_REVIEW_PLAN aan de prompt + getIdeaPromptText
- wait-for-job.ts: getFullJobContext handelt IDEA_REVIEW_PLAN-jobs af

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat(create_story): optionele sprint_id om story aan sprint te koppelen

create_story accepteert nu een optionele sprint_id; bij meegeven wordt de
story aangemaakt met status=IN_SPRINT (sprint moet bij hetzelfde product
horen als de PBI). Handler geextraheerd naar handleCreateStory voor
testbaarheid; nieuwe unit-tests in __tests__/create-story.test.ts.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(test): maak create-sprint auto-code test datum-onafhankelijk

De test hardcodede 2026-05-11-datums maar berekende "today" dynamisch,
waardoor hij alleen op die datum slaagde. Mock-codes nu relatief aan today.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: bump version 0.7.0 -> 0.8.0

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: bump vendor/scrum4me submodule naar app-main (7bb252c)

De submodule stond 27 commits achter (3c77342, v1.0.0-147), waardoor
sync-schema.sh prisma/schema.prisma terugzette naar een versie zonder
IDEA_REVIEW_PLAN. Bumpt naar huidige app-main + re-synct het schema;
enige inhoudelijke wijziging is het nieuwe User.settings-veld.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Madhura68 <ID+Madhura68@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-14 16:30:17 +02:00
19 changed files with 1049 additions and 107 deletions

View file

@ -104,10 +104,13 @@ describe('handleCreateSprint', () => {
})
it('auto-code increments past existing same-day sprints', async () => {
// Codes moeten relatief aan "vandaag" zijn: generateNextSprintCode telt
// alleen same-day sprints. Hardcoded datums maakten deze test datum-flaky.
const today = new Date().toISOString().slice(0, 10)
mockPrisma.sprint.findMany.mockResolvedValue([
{ code: 'S-2026-05-11-1' },
{ code: 'S-2026-05-11-3' },
{ code: 'S-2026-05-10-7' },
{ code: `S-${today}-1` },
{ code: `S-${today}-3` },
{ code: 'S-2020-01-01-7' },
])
mockPrisma.sprint.create.mockResolvedValue({
id: 'spr-3', code: 'X', sprint_goal: 'g', status: 'OPEN', start_date: new Date(), created_at: new Date(),
@ -115,7 +118,6 @@ describe('handleCreateSprint', () => {
await handleCreateSprint({ product_id: PRODUCT_ID, sprint_goal: 'g' })
const today = new Date().toISOString().slice(0, 10)
expect(mockPrisma.sprint.create.mock.calls[0][0].data.code).toBe(`S-${today}-4`)
})

View file

@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest'
vi.mock('../src/prisma.js', () => ({
prisma: {
pbi: { findUnique: vi.fn() },
sprint: { findUnique: vi.fn() },
story: {
findFirst: vi.fn(),
findMany: vi.fn(),
create: vi.fn(),
},
},
}))
vi.mock('../src/auth.js', () => ({
requireWriteAccess: vi.fn(),
PermissionDeniedError: class PermissionDeniedError extends Error {
constructor(message = 'Demo accounts cannot perform write operations') {
super(message)
this.name = 'PermissionDeniedError'
}
},
}))
vi.mock('../src/access.js', () => ({
userCanAccessProduct: vi.fn(),
}))
import { prisma } from '../src/prisma.js'
import { requireWriteAccess } from '../src/auth.js'
import { userCanAccessProduct } from '../src/access.js'
import { handleCreateStory } from '../src/tools/create-story.js'
const mockPrisma = prisma as unknown as {
pbi: { findUnique: ReturnType<typeof vi.fn> }
sprint: { findUnique: ReturnType<typeof vi.fn> }
story: {
findFirst: ReturnType<typeof vi.fn>
findMany: ReturnType<typeof vi.fn>
create: ReturnType<typeof vi.fn>
}
}
const mockRequireWriteAccess = requireWriteAccess as ReturnType<typeof vi.fn>
const mockUserCanAccessProduct = userCanAccessProduct as ReturnType<typeof vi.fn>
const PRODUCT_ID = 'prod-1'
const PBI_ID = 'pbi-1'
const SPRINT_ID = 'spr-1'
const USER_ID = 'user-1'
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks()
mockRequireWriteAccess.mockResolvedValue({ userId: USER_ID, tokenId: 'tok-1', username: 'alice', isDemo: false })
mockUserCanAccessProduct.mockResolvedValue(true)
mockPrisma.pbi.findUnique.mockResolvedValue({ product_id: PRODUCT_ID })
mockPrisma.story.findMany.mockResolvedValue([])
mockPrisma.story.findFirst.mockResolvedValue(null)
mockPrisma.story.create.mockImplementation((args: { data: Record<string, unknown> }) =>
Promise.resolve({ id: 'story-1', created_at: new Date('2026-05-14T10:00:00Z'), ...args.data }),
)
})
function parseResult(result: Awaited<ReturnType<typeof handleCreateStory>>) {
const text = result.content?.[0]?.type === 'text' ? result.content[0].text : ''
try { return JSON.parse(text) } catch { return text }
}
function errorText(result: Awaited<ReturnType<typeof handleCreateStory>>): string {
return result.content?.[0]?.type === 'text' ? result.content[0].text : ''
}
describe('handleCreateStory', () => {
it('without sprint_id: creates story with status OPEN and no sprint', async () => {
const result = await handleCreateStory({ pbi_id: PBI_ID, title: 'A story', priority: 2 })
expect(mockPrisma.sprint.findUnique).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
const data = mockPrisma.story.create.mock.calls[0][0].data
expect(data.status).toBe('OPEN')
expect(data.sprint_id).toBeNull()
expect(data.product_id).toBe(PRODUCT_ID)
expect(parseResult(result).status).toBe('OPEN')
})
it('with valid sprint_id: links story to sprint with status IN_SPRINT', async () => {
mockPrisma.sprint.findUnique.mockResolvedValue({ product_id: PRODUCT_ID })
const result = await handleCreateStory({
pbi_id: PBI_ID,
title: 'A story',
priority: 2,
sprint_id: SPRINT_ID,
})
expect(mockPrisma.sprint.findUnique).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
where: { id: SPRINT_ID },
select: { product_id: true },
})
const data = mockPrisma.story.create.mock.calls[0][0].data
expect(data.status).toBe('IN_SPRINT')
expect(data.sprint_id).toBe(SPRINT_ID)
expect(parseResult(result).sprint_id).toBe(SPRINT_ID)
})
it('rejects a non-existent sprint_id', async () => {
mockPrisma.sprint.findUnique.mockResolvedValue(null)
const result = await handleCreateStory({
pbi_id: PBI_ID,
title: 'A story',
priority: 2,
sprint_id: 'missing',
})
expect(mockPrisma.story.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
expect(errorText(result)).toMatch(/Sprint missing not found/)
})
it('rejects a sprint from a different product', async () => {
mockPrisma.sprint.findUnique.mockResolvedValue({ product_id: 'other-product' })
const result = await handleCreateStory({
pbi_id: PBI_ID,
title: 'A story',
priority: 2,
sprint_id: SPRINT_ID,
})
expect(mockPrisma.story.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
expect(errorText(result)).toMatch(/different product/)
})
it('returns error when PBI not found', async () => {
mockPrisma.pbi.findUnique.mockResolvedValue(null)
const result = await handleCreateStory({ pbi_id: 'missing', title: 'A story', priority: 2 })
expect(mockPrisma.sprint.findUnique).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
expect(mockPrisma.story.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
expect(errorText(result)).toMatch(/PBI missing not found/)
})
})

View file

@ -113,6 +113,71 @@ describe('createWorktreeForJob', () => {
}),
).rejects.toThrow('Worktree path already exists')
})
it('reuseBranch: reuses an existing local branch', async () => {
const { repoDir, originDir } = await setupRepo()
tmpDirs.push(repoDir, originDir)
await makeWorktreeParent()
// Sibling already created the branch locally.
await git(['branch', 'feat/sprint-abc', 'origin/main'], repoDir)
const result = await createWorktreeForJob({
repoRoot: repoDir,
jobId: 'job-reuse-local',
branchName: 'feat/sprint-abc',
baseRef: 'origin/main',
reuseBranch: true,
})
const { stdout } = await git(['rev-parse', '--abbrev-ref', 'HEAD'], result.worktreePath)
expect(stdout.trim()).toBe('feat/sprint-abc')
expect(result.branchName).toBe('feat/sprint-abc')
})
it('reuseBranch: recreates a local branch from origin when only the remote has it', async () => {
const { repoDir, originDir } = await setupRepo()
tmpDirs.push(repoDir, originDir)
await makeWorktreeParent()
// Branch exists on origin (a sibling pushed it, or the container was
// recreated and the local clone is fresh) but not as a local branch.
await git(['branch', 'feat/sprint-xyz', 'origin/main'], repoDir)
await git(['push', 'origin', 'feat/sprint-xyz'], repoDir)
await git(['branch', '-D', 'feat/sprint-xyz'], repoDir)
const result = await createWorktreeForJob({
repoRoot: repoDir,
jobId: 'job-reuse-origin',
branchName: 'feat/sprint-xyz',
baseRef: 'origin/main',
reuseBranch: true,
})
const { stdout } = await git(['rev-parse', '--abbrev-ref', 'HEAD'], result.worktreePath)
expect(stdout.trim()).toBe('feat/sprint-xyz')
})
it('reuseBranch: falls back to a fresh branch when it exists nowhere (cross-repo sprint)', async () => {
const { repoDir, originDir } = await setupRepo()
tmpDirs.push(repoDir, originDir)
await makeWorktreeParent()
// reuseBranch is decided sprint-wide; for the first job targeting THIS
// repo the branch exists neither locally nor on origin. Must not throw
// "invalid reference" — should create it fresh from baseRef.
const result = await createWorktreeForJob({
repoRoot: repoDir,
jobId: 'job-reuse-fresh',
branchName: 'feat/sprint-newrepo',
baseRef: 'origin/main',
reuseBranch: true,
})
const { stdout } = await git(['rev-parse', '--abbrev-ref', 'HEAD'], result.worktreePath)
expect(stdout.trim()).toBe('feat/sprint-newrepo')
expect(result.branchName).toBe('feat/sprint-newrepo')
})
})
describe('removeWorktreeForJob', () => {

View file

@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest'
vi.mock('../src/prisma.js', () => ({
prisma: {
idea: { update: vi.fn() },
ideaLog: { create: vi.fn() },
$transaction: vi.fn(),
},
}))
vi.mock('../src/auth.js', () => ({
requireWriteAccess: vi.fn(),
PermissionDeniedError: class PermissionDeniedError extends Error {
constructor(message = 'Demo accounts cannot perform write operations') {
super(message)
this.name = 'PermissionDeniedError'
}
},
}))
vi.mock('../src/access.js', () => ({
userOwnsIdea: vi.fn(),
}))
import { prisma } from '../src/prisma.js'
import { requireWriteAccess } from '../src/auth.js'
import { userOwnsIdea } from '../src/access.js'
import { handleUpdateIdeaPlanReviewed } from '../src/tools/update-idea-plan-reviewed.js'
const mockPrisma = prisma as unknown as {
idea: { update: ReturnType<typeof vi.fn> }
ideaLog: { create: ReturnType<typeof vi.fn> }
$transaction: ReturnType<typeof vi.fn>
}
const mockRequireWriteAccess = requireWriteAccess as ReturnType<typeof vi.fn>
const mockUserOwnsIdea = userOwnsIdea as ReturnType<typeof vi.fn>
const IDEA_ID = 'idea-1'
const USER_ID = 'user-1'
const REVIEW_LOG = {
rounds: [{ score: 88 }],
convergence: { stable_at_round: 2 },
approval: { status: 'approved' },
}
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks()
mockRequireWriteAccess.mockResolvedValue({
userId: USER_ID,
tokenId: 'tok-1',
username: 'alice',
isDemo: false,
})
mockUserOwnsIdea.mockResolvedValue(true)
// $transaction returns the array of its two operations' results; the handler
// only reads result[0] (the idea.update result).
mockPrisma.$transaction.mockImplementation(async () => [
{ id: IDEA_ID, status: 'PLACEHOLDER', code: 'IDEA-1' },
{},
])
})
function parseResult(result: Awaited<ReturnType<typeof handleUpdateIdeaPlanReviewed>>) {
const text = result.content?.[0]?.type === 'text' ? result.content[0].text : ''
try {
return JSON.parse(text)
} catch {
return text
}
}
// The handler builds `data.status` inside the idea.update call passed to
// $transaction. We capture it by inspecting the prisma.idea.update mock args.
function statusPassedToUpdate(): string | undefined {
const call = mockPrisma.idea.update.mock.calls[0]
return call?.[0]?.data?.status
}
describe('handleUpdateIdeaPlanReviewed — status transition', () => {
it('approval_status="approved" → PLAN_REVIEWED', async () => {
await handleUpdateIdeaPlanReviewed({
idea_id: IDEA_ID,
review_log: REVIEW_LOG,
approval_status: 'approved',
})
expect(statusPassedToUpdate()).toBe('PLAN_REVIEWED')
})
it('approval_status="rejected" → PLAN_REVIEW_FAILED', async () => {
await handleUpdateIdeaPlanReviewed({
idea_id: IDEA_ID,
review_log: REVIEW_LOG,
approval_status: 'rejected',
})
expect(statusPassedToUpdate()).toBe('PLAN_REVIEW_FAILED')
})
it('approval_status="pending" → PLAN_REVIEW_FAILED (needs manual approval, never silently approved)', async () => {
await handleUpdateIdeaPlanReviewed({
idea_id: IDEA_ID,
review_log: REVIEW_LOG,
approval_status: 'pending',
})
expect(statusPassedToUpdate()).toBe('PLAN_REVIEW_FAILED')
})
it('omitted approval_status → PLAN_REVIEW_FAILED (safe default, not PLAN_REVIEWED)', async () => {
await handleUpdateIdeaPlanReviewed({
idea_id: IDEA_ID,
review_log: REVIEW_LOG,
})
expect(statusPassedToUpdate()).toBe('PLAN_REVIEW_FAILED')
})
it('returns "Idea not found" when the user does not own the idea', async () => {
mockUserOwnsIdea.mockResolvedValue(false)
const result = await handleUpdateIdeaPlanReviewed({
idea_id: IDEA_ID,
review_log: REVIEW_LOG,
approval_status: 'approved',
})
expect(parseResult(result)).toContain('Idea not found')
expect(mockPrisma.idea.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
it('persists review_log + reviewed_at and logs a PLAN_REVIEW_RESULT entry', async () => {
await handleUpdateIdeaPlanReviewed({
idea_id: IDEA_ID,
review_log: REVIEW_LOG,
approval_status: 'approved',
})
const updateArg = mockPrisma.idea.update.mock.calls[0]?.[0]
expect(updateArg?.data?.plan_review_log).toEqual(REVIEW_LOG)
expect(updateArg?.data?.reviewed_at).toBeInstanceOf(Date)
const logArg = mockPrisma.ideaLog.create.mock.calls[0]?.[0]
expect(logArg?.data?.type).toBe('PLAN_REVIEW_RESULT')
expect(logArg?.data?.idea_id).toBe(IDEA_ID)
})
})

View file

@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ vi.mock('../src/prisma.js', () => ({
prisma: {
product: { findUnique: vi.fn() },
task: { findUnique: vi.fn() },
claudeJob: { findFirst: vi.fn(), findUnique: vi.fn() },
claudeJob: { findFirst: vi.fn(), findMany: vi.fn(), findUnique: vi.fn() },
},
}))
@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ const mockPrisma = prisma as unknown as {
task: { findUnique: ReturnType<typeof vi.fn> }
claudeJob: {
findFirst: ReturnType<typeof vi.fn>
findMany: ReturnType<typeof vi.fn>
findUnique: ReturnType<typeof vi.fn>
}
}
@ -41,9 +42,10 @@ beforeEach(() => {
mockPrisma.product.findUnique.mockResolvedValue({ auto_pr: true })
mockPrisma.task.findUnique.mockResolvedValue({
title: 'Add feature',
repo_url: null,
story: { id: 'story-1', code: 'SCRUM-42', title: 'Story title' },
})
mockPrisma.claudeJob.findFirst.mockResolvedValue(null) // no sibling PR by default
mockPrisma.claudeJob.findMany.mockResolvedValue([]) // no sibling PRs by default
// Default: legacy job zonder sprint_run (STORY-mode pad).
mockPrisma.claudeJob.findUnique.mockResolvedValue({ sprint_run_id: null, sprint_run: null })
mockCreatePr.mockResolvedValue({ url: 'https://github.com/org/repo/pull/99' })
@ -62,12 +64,27 @@ describe('maybeCreateAutoPr', () => {
})
it('reuses sibling pr_url when another job in same story already opened a PR', async () => {
mockPrisma.claudeJob.findFirst.mockResolvedValue({ pr_url: 'https://github.com/org/repo/pull/77' })
mockPrisma.claudeJob.findMany.mockResolvedValue([
{ pr_url: 'https://github.com/org/repo/pull/77', task: { repo_url: null } },
])
const url = await maybeCreateAutoPr(BASE_OPTS)
expect(url).toBe('https://github.com/org/repo/pull/77')
expect(mockCreatePr).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
it('does NOT reuse a sibling PR from a different repo (cross-repo story)', async () => {
// Sibling targeted another repo via task.repo_url — its PR must not leak in.
mockPrisma.claudeJob.findMany.mockResolvedValue([
{
pr_url: 'https://github.com/org/other-repo/pull/12',
task: { repo_url: 'https://github.com/org/other-repo' },
},
])
const url = await maybeCreateAutoPr(BASE_OPTS)
expect(url).toBe('https://github.com/org/repo/pull/99') // fresh PR, not the sibling's
expect(mockCreatePr).toHaveBeenCalledOnce()
})
it('returns null when auto_pr=false', async () => {
mockPrisma.product.findUnique.mockResolvedValue({ auto_pr: false })
const url = await maybeCreateAutoPr(BASE_OPTS)
@ -78,6 +95,7 @@ describe('maybeCreateAutoPr', () => {
it('uses story title without code prefix when story has no code', async () => {
mockPrisma.task.findUnique.mockResolvedValue({
title: 'Add feature',
repo_url: null,
story: { id: 'story-1', code: null, title: 'Story title' },
})
await maybeCreateAutoPr(BASE_OPTS)
@ -113,7 +131,9 @@ describe('maybeCreateAutoPr', () => {
sprint_run_id: 'run-1',
sprint_run: { id: 'run-1', pr_strategy: 'SPRINT', sprint: { sprint_goal: 'Goal' } },
})
mockPrisma.claudeJob.findFirst.mockResolvedValue({ pr_url: 'https://github.com/org/repo/pull/55' })
mockPrisma.claudeJob.findMany.mockResolvedValue([
{ pr_url: 'https://github.com/org/repo/pull/55', task: { repo_url: null } },
])
const url = await maybeCreateAutoPr(BASE_OPTS)
@ -121,6 +141,29 @@ describe('maybeCreateAutoPr', () => {
expect(mockCreatePr).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
it('SPRINT-mode: cross-repo — sibling-PR van ander repo wordt niet hergebruikt', async () => {
mockPrisma.claudeJob.findUnique.mockResolvedValue({
sprint_run_id: 'run-1',
sprint_run: { id: 'run-1', pr_strategy: 'SPRINT', sprint: { sprint_goal: 'Goal' } },
})
// Deze job target een ander repo via task.repo_url.
mockPrisma.task.findUnique.mockResolvedValue({
title: 'MCP-taak',
repo_url: 'https://github.com/org/scrum4me-mcp',
story: { id: 'story-1', code: 'SCRUM-9', title: 'Story title' },
})
// Sibling met pr_url hoort bij het product-repo (repo_url null) → andere bucket.
mockPrisma.claudeJob.findMany.mockResolvedValue([
{ pr_url: 'https://github.com/org/repo/pull/201', task: { repo_url: null } },
])
const url = await maybeCreateAutoPr(BASE_OPTS)
// Geen hergebruik van de product-repo PR → eigen draft-PR voor het mcp-repo.
expect(url).toBe('https://github.com/org/repo/pull/99')
expect(mockCreatePr).toHaveBeenCalledOnce()
})
it('returns null and does not throw when gh fails', async () => {
mockCreatePr.mockResolvedValue({ error: 'gh CLI not found' })
const url = await maybeCreateAutoPr(BASE_OPTS)

View file

@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
// Unit-tests voor resolveJobTimestamps — de status-gedreven timestamp-helper
// van update_job_status. Pure functie, geen mocks (zoals update-job-status-gate).
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest'
import { resolveJobTimestamps } from '../src/tools/update-job-status.js'
const NOW = new Date('2026-05-14T12:00:00.000Z')
const EARLIER = new Date('2026-05-14T11:00:00.000Z')
describe('resolveJobTimestamps', () => {
describe('running', () => {
it('sets started_at when not yet set, no finished_at', () => {
const r = resolveJobTimestamps('running', { claimed_at: EARLIER, started_at: null }, NOW)
expect(r.started_at).toBe(NOW)
expect(r.finished_at).toBeUndefined()
expect(r.claimed_at).toBeUndefined()
})
it('is set-once: does not re-stamp started_at when already set', () => {
const r = resolveJobTimestamps('running', { claimed_at: EARLIER, started_at: EARLIER }, NOW)
expect(r.started_at).toBeUndefined()
expect(r.finished_at).toBeUndefined()
expect(r.claimed_at).toBeUndefined()
})
})
describe('terminal transitions (done/failed/skipped)', () => {
it.each(['done', 'failed', 'skipped'] as const)(
'backfills started_at and sets finished_at for %s when started_at is null',
(status) => {
const r = resolveJobTimestamps(status, { claimed_at: EARLIER, started_at: null }, NOW)
expect(r.started_at).toBe(NOW)
expect(r.finished_at).toBe(NOW)
expect(r.claimed_at).toBeUndefined()
},
)
it('only sets finished_at when started_at is already set', () => {
const r = resolveJobTimestamps('done', { claimed_at: EARLIER, started_at: EARLIER }, NOW)
expect(r.started_at).toBeUndefined()
expect(r.finished_at).toBe(NOW)
expect(r.claimed_at).toBeUndefined()
})
})
describe('claimed_at backfill', () => {
it.each(['running', 'done', 'failed', 'skipped'] as const)(
'backfills claimed_at for %s when it is null',
(status) => {
const r = resolveJobTimestamps(status, { claimed_at: null, started_at: null }, NOW)
expect(r.claimed_at).toBe(NOW)
},
)
it('never returns claimed_at when it is already set', () => {
const r = resolveJobTimestamps('done', { claimed_at: EARLIER, started_at: EARLIER }, NOW)
expect(r.claimed_at).toBeUndefined()
})
})
it('returns only finished_at when all timestamps are already set and status is terminal', () => {
const r = resolveJobTimestamps('failed', { claimed_at: EARLIER, started_at: EARLIER }, NOW)
expect(r).toEqual({ finished_at: NOW })
})
it('defaults now to a fresh Date when omitted', () => {
const before = Date.now()
const r = resolveJobTimestamps('running', { claimed_at: EARLIER, started_at: null })
const after = Date.now()
expect(r.started_at).toBeInstanceOf(Date)
expect(r.started_at!.getTime()).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(before)
expect(r.started_at!.getTime()).toBeLessThanOrEqual(after)
})
})

4
package-lock.json generated
View file

@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
{
"name": "scrum4me-mcp",
"version": "0.7.0",
"version": "0.8.0",
"lockfileVersion": 3,
"requires": true,
"packages": {
"": {
"name": "scrum4me-mcp",
"version": "0.7.0",
"version": "0.8.0",
"hasInstallScript": true,
"license": "MIT",
"dependencies": {

View file

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{
"name": "scrum4me-mcp",
"version": "0.7.0",
"version": "0.8.0",
"description": "MCP server for Scrum4Me — exposes dev-flow tools and prompts via the Model Context Protocol",
"type": "module",
"bin": {

View file

@ -100,6 +100,9 @@ enum IdeaStatus {
PLANNING
PLAN_FAILED
PLAN_READY
REVIEWING_PLAN
PLAN_REVIEW_FAILED
PLAN_REVIEWED
PLANNED
}
@ -107,6 +110,7 @@ enum ClaudeJobKind {
TASK_IMPLEMENTATION
IDEA_GRILL
IDEA_MAKE_PLAN
IDEA_REVIEW_PLAN
PLAN_CHAT
SPRINT_IMPLEMENTATION
}
@ -124,6 +128,7 @@ enum IdeaLogType {
NOTE
GRILL_RESULT
PLAN_RESULT
PLAN_REVIEW_RESULT
STATUS_CHANGE
JOB_EVENT
}
@ -147,6 +152,7 @@ model User {
active_product Product? @relation("UserActiveProduct", fields: [active_product_id], references: [id], onDelete: SetNull)
idea_code_counter Int @default(0)
min_quota_pct Int @default(20)
settings Json @default("{}")
created_at DateTime @default(now())
updated_at DateTime @updatedAt
roles UserRole[]
@ -510,22 +516,24 @@ model ProductMember {
}
model Idea {
id String @id @default(cuid())
user User @relation(fields: [user_id], references: [id], onDelete: Cascade)
user_id String
product Product? @relation(fields: [product_id], references: [id], onDelete: SetNull)
product_id String?
code String @db.VarChar(30)
title String
description String? @db.VarChar(4000)
grill_md String? @db.Text
plan_md String? @db.Text
pbi Pbi? @relation(fields: [pbi_id], references: [id], onDelete: SetNull)
pbi_id String? @unique
status IdeaStatus @default(DRAFT)
archived Boolean @default(false)
created_at DateTime @default(now())
updated_at DateTime @updatedAt
id String @id @default(cuid())
user User @relation(fields: [user_id], references: [id], onDelete: Cascade)
user_id String
product Product? @relation(fields: [product_id], references: [id], onDelete: SetNull)
product_id String?
code String @db.VarChar(30)
title String
description String? @db.VarChar(4000)
grill_md String? @db.Text
plan_md String? @db.Text
plan_review_log Json? // ReviewLog from orchestrator (all rounds, convergence metrics, approval status)
reviewed_at DateTime? // When last reviewed
pbi Pbi? @relation(fields: [pbi_id], references: [id], onDelete: SetNull)
pbi_id String? @unique
status IdeaStatus @default(DRAFT)
archived Boolean @default(false)
created_at DateTime @default(now())
updated_at DateTime @updatedAt
questions ClaudeQuestion[]
jobs ClaudeJob[]

View file

@ -15,6 +15,19 @@ async function branchExists(repoRoot: string, name: string): Promise<boolean> {
}
}
async function remoteBranchExists(repoRoot: string, name: string): Promise<boolean> {
try {
await exec(
'git',
['show-ref', '--verify', '--quiet', `refs/remotes/origin/${name}`],
{ cwd: repoRoot },
)
return true
} catch {
return false
}
}
async function findWorktreeForBranch(
repoRoot: string,
branchName: string,
@ -75,7 +88,27 @@ export async function createWorktreeForJob(opts: {
if (occupant) {
await exec('git', ['worktree', 'remove', '--force', occupant], { cwd: repoRoot })
}
await exec('git', ['worktree', 'add', worktreePath, branchName], { cwd: repoRoot })
// reuseBranch is decided sprint-wide, but git branches are per-repo. For a
// cross-repo sprint the first job targeting THIS repo gets reuseBranch=true
// even though the branch was never created here; a container recreate also
// wipes the local clone. Fall back gracefully instead of failing with
// "invalid reference":
// - local branch exists → reuse it
// - exists on origin only → recreate the local branch tracking origin
// - nowhere → create it fresh from baseRef
if (await branchExists(repoRoot, branchName)) {
await exec('git', ['worktree', 'add', worktreePath, branchName], { cwd: repoRoot })
} else if (await remoteBranchExists(repoRoot, branchName)) {
await exec(
'git',
['worktree', 'add', '-b', branchName, worktreePath, `origin/${branchName}`],
{ cwd: repoRoot },
)
} else {
await exec('git', ['worktree', 'add', '-b', branchName, worktreePath, baseRef], {
cwd: repoRoot,
})
}
return { worktreePath, branchName }
}

View file

@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ import { registerMarkPbiPrMergedTool } from './tools/mark-pbi-pr-merged.js'
import { registerGetIdeaContextTool } from './tools/get-idea-context.js'
import { registerUpdateIdeaGrillMdTool } from './tools/update-idea-grill-md.js'
import { registerUpdateIdeaPlanMdTool } from './tools/update-idea-plan-md.js'
import { registerUpdateIdeaPlanReviewedTool } from './tools/update-idea-plan-reviewed.js'
import { registerLogIdeaDecisionTool } from './tools/log-idea-decision.js'
import { registerGetWorkerSettingsTool } from './tools/get-worker-settings.js'
import { registerWorkerHeartbeatTool } from './tools/worker-heartbeat.js'
@ -97,6 +98,7 @@ async function main() {
registerGetIdeaContextTool(server)
registerUpdateIdeaGrillMdTool(server)
registerUpdateIdeaPlanMdTool(server)
registerUpdateIdeaPlanReviewedTool(server)
registerLogIdeaDecisionTool(server)
// M13: worker quota-gate tools
registerGetWorkerSettingsTool(server)

View file

@ -101,6 +101,19 @@ const KIND_DEFAULTS: Record<string, JobConfig> = {
'mcp__scrum4me__update_job_status',
],
},
IDEA_REVIEW_PLAN: {
model: 'claude-opus-4-7',
thinking_budget: 6000,
permission_mode: 'acceptEdits',
max_turns: 1,
allowed_tools: [
'Read', 'Write', 'Grep', 'Glob',
'mcp__scrum4me__update_idea_plan_reviewed',
'mcp__scrum4me__log_idea_decision',
'mcp__scrum4me__update_job_status',
'mcp__scrum4me__ask_user_question',
],
},
PLAN_CHAT: {
model: 'claude-sonnet-4-6',
thinking_budget: 6000,

View file

@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ function loadPrompt(rel: string): string {
const KIND_TO_PROMPT_PATH: Partial<Record<ClaudeJobKind, string>> = {
IDEA_GRILL: 'idea/grill.md',
IDEA_MAKE_PLAN: 'idea/make-plan.md',
IDEA_REVIEW_PLAN: 'idea/review-plan.md',
TASK_IMPLEMENTATION: 'task/implementation.md',
SPRINT_IMPLEMENTATION: 'sprint/implementation.md',
PLAN_CHAT: 'plan-chat/chat.md',
@ -40,9 +41,9 @@ export function getKindPromptText(kind: ClaudeJobKind): string {
}
// Back-compat re-export. wait-for-job.ts roept getIdeaPromptText aan voor
// de twee idea-kinds; behouden zodat we de bestaande call-site niet hoeven
// de drie idea-kinds; behouden zodat we de bestaande call-site niet hoeven
// te wijzigen tot een aparte cleanup-pass.
export function getIdeaPromptText(kind: ClaudeJobKind): string {
if (kind !== 'IDEA_GRILL' && kind !== 'IDEA_MAKE_PLAN') return ''
if (kind !== 'IDEA_GRILL' && kind !== 'IDEA_MAKE_PLAN' && kind !== 'IDEA_REVIEW_PLAN') return ''
return getKindPromptText(kind)
}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,210 @@
# Review-Plan-prompt voor IDEA_REVIEW_PLAN-jobs
> Deze prompt wordt door `wait_for_job` meegestuurd in de payload van een
> `IDEA_REVIEW_PLAN`-job. Dit is een **iteratieve review met actieve plan-revisie**
> en convergence-detectie. Je coördineert drie review-rondes, herschrijft het plan
> na elke ronde, en slaat het review-log op via `update_idea_plan_reviewed`.
---
Je bent een **plan-review-orchestrator** voor Scrum4Me-idee `{idea_code}`.
Je context (meegegeven in `wait_for_job`-payload):
- `idea.plan_md`: het te reviewen plan-document (YAML frontmatter + body)
- `idea.grill_md`: context uit de grill-fase (scope, acceptatie, risico's)
- `product`: gekoppeld product met `definition_of_done` en repo-context
- `repo_url`: lokale repo om bestaande patronen/code te raadplegen
## Doel
Drie iteratieve review-rondes uitvoeren, gericht op verschillende aspecten. Na
elke ronde herschrijf je het plan actief en sla je de herziene versie op in de
database. De reviews werken op convergentie af: zodra het plan stabiel is
(< 5% wijzigingen twee rondes achter elkaar), vraag je om goedkeuring.
**Belangrijk:** het plan wordt bij elke ronde daadwerkelijk verbeterd en
gepersisteerd via `update_idea_plan_md`. Dit is geen passieve review — je
coördineert een actief verbeterproces.
## Werkwijze
### Setup (voor ronde 1)
1. Lees `idea.plan_md` volledig — dit is de startversie van het plan.
2. Lees `idea.grill_md` voor scope/acceptatiecriteria-context.
3. **Laad codex** (verplicht, niet optioneel):
- Glob + Read alle `docs/patterns/**/*.md` → architectuurpatronen
- Glob + Read alle `docs/architecture/**/*.md` → systeemdesign
- Read `CLAUDE.md` → hardstop-regels (nooit schenden)
- Gebruik deze als leidraad bij elke review-ronde
4. Initialiseer `review_log`:
```json
{ "plan_file": "{idea_code}", "created_at": "<now>",
"rounds": [], "approval": { "status": "pending" } }
```
### Per Review-Ronde
**Ronde 1 — Structuur & Syntax (Haiku-perspectief: snel en scherp)**
- Rol: structuur-reviewer — focus op correctheid, niet op inhoud
- Controleer: YAML parseable, alle verplichte velden aanwezig, geen lege strings,
priority-waarden valid (14), markdown-structuur intact
- Herschrijf plan_md: corrigeer structuurfouten en formatting
- *Opmerking multi-model:* directe Haiku API-call is momenteel niet beschikbaar
via job-config; voer deze rol zelf uit met een compacte, syntax-gerichte blik
**Ronde 2 — Logica & Patronen (Sonnet-perspectief: diep en patroon-bewust)**
- Rol: architectuur-reviewer — focus op logica, volledigheid en patroonconformiteit
- Controleer: stories volgen uit grill-criteria, tasks zijn concreet
(bestandsnamen, commando's), patterns uit `docs/patterns/` worden gevolgd,
`verify_required` coherent, dependency-cascades geadresseerd
- Herschrijf plan_md: vul gaten aan, maak tasks specifieker, voeg missende stappen toe
**Ronde 3 — Risico & Edge Cases (Opus-perspectief: kritisch en breed)**
- Rol: risico-reviewer — focus op wat mis kan gaan
- Controleer: grote taken gesplitst, refactors hebben undo-strategie,
schema-changes hebben migratie-taken, type-checking expliciet, concurrency
geadresseerd, error-handling per actie, feature-flags voor grote changes
- Herschrijf plan_md: voeg risico-mitigatie toe, split te grote taken
### Plan Revision (na elke ronde — verplicht)
Na het uitvoeren van de review-criteria:
1. Sla de huidige versie op als `plan_before` in `review_log.rounds[N]`.
2. Herschrijf `plan_md` — integreer de gevonden verbeteringen.
3. Bereken `diff_pct = changed_lines / total_lines * 100`.
4. Sla de herziene versie op als `plan_after` in `review_log.rounds[N]`.
5. **Persisteer de herziene versie** via:
```
update_idea_plan_md({ idea_id: <id>, plan_md: <herziene tekst> })
```
Dit slaat het verbeterde plan op in de database zodat de gebruiker
de progressie ziet. Sla dit stap niet over — ook al zijn er weinig
wijzigingen.
### Convergence Detection
Na elke ronde (m.u.v. ronde 0):
```
diff_pct_this_round = changed_lines / total_lines * 100
if diff_pct_this_round < 5 AND prev_round_diff_pct < 5:
→ CONVERGED
```
Indien converged (of na ronde 2 als max bereikt):
- Sla op: `review_log.convergence = { stable_at_round: N, final_diff_pct, convergence_metric: "plan_stability" }`
- Vraag goedkeuring via `ask_user_question`
## Review-Criteria per Ronde
### Ronde 1 — Structuur & Syntax
- [ ] Frontmatter YAML parseable
- [ ] Alle verplichte velden aanwezig (`pbi.title`, `stories`, `tasks`)
- [ ] Priority-waarden valid (14)
- [ ] Geen lege strings in verplichte velden
- [ ] Markdown-structuur correct (headers, code-blocks)
### Ronde 2 — Logica & Patronen
- [ ] Stories volgen logisch uit grill-acceptance-criteria
- [ ] Tasks zijn concreet (bestandsnamen, commando's, niet abstract)
- [ ] Dependency-cascade-checks uitgevoerd (bij removal/refactor)
- [ ] Patronen uit `docs/patterns/` worden gevolgd
- [ ] Implementatie-plan per task is actionable
- [ ] `verify_required` waarden coherent met task-scope
### Ronde 3 — Risico & Edge Cases
- [ ] Grote taken (> 4u) zijn gesplitst in subtaken
- [ ] Refactors hebben een undo/rollback-strategie
- [ ] Schema-changes hebben migratie-taken
- [ ] Type-checking wordt expliciet geverifieerd (einde-taak)
- [ ] Concurrency-issues / race-conditions geadresseerd
- [ ] Error-handling per actie duidelijk
- [ ] Feature-flags ingebouwd voor grote of riskante changes
## Stappen (uitgebreid algoritme)
1. **Init**
- Lees plan_md + grill_md.
- Laad codex (docs/patterns, docs/architecture, CLAUDE.md).
- Initialiseer `review_log`.
2. **Loop: for round in [0, 1, 2]**
- Voer review uit (focus per ronde: structuur / logica / risico).
- Sla `plan_before` op.
- Herschrijf plan_md op basis van bevindingen.
- Roep `update_idea_plan_md` aan met de herziene tekst.
- Sla `plan_after` + `issues` + `score` + `diff_pct` op in review_log.
- Check convergence (na ronde 1+).
- Break indien converged.
3. **Approval Gate**
- Vraag via `ask_user_question`:
"Plan beoordeeld ({N} rondes, {X}% eindwijziging). Goedkeuren?"
- Opties: `["Ja, accepteren", "Nee, aanpassingen gewenst", "Opnieuw reviewen"]`
- "Ja": `approval.status = 'approved'` → ga door naar Save & Close.
- "Nee": `approval.status = 'rejected'` → sluit af (user kan handmatig editen).
- "Opnieuw": max 2 extra rondes (rondes 34), dan dwingend approval vragen.
4. **Save & Close**
- Call `update_idea_plan_reviewed({ idea_id, review_log, approval_status })`.
- Call `update_job_status({ job_id, status: 'done', summary: review_log.summary })`.
## Output-format review_log (strikt JSON)
```json
{
"plan_file": "IDEA-016",
"created_at": "ISO8601",
"rounds": [
{
"round": 0,
"model": "claude-opus-4-7",
"role": "Structure Review",
"focus": "YAML parsing, format, syntax",
"plan_before": "<origineel plan_md>",
"plan_after": "<herzien plan_md na ronde>",
"issues": [
{
"category": "structure|logic|risk|pattern",
"severity": "error|warning|info",
"suggestion": "wat te fixen"
}
],
"score": 75,
"plan_diff_lines": 12,
"converged": false,
"timestamp": "ISO8601"
}
],
"convergence": {
"stable_at_round": 2,
"final_diff_pct": 2.1,
"convergence_metric": "plan_stability"
},
"approval": {
"status": "pending|approved|rejected",
"timestamp": "ISO8601"
},
"summary": "12 zinnen samenvatting: X rondes, Y% wijziging, status"
}
```
## Foutgevallen
- **Plan parse-fout**: `update_job_status('failed', error: 'plan_parse_failed')` — stop.
- **update_idea_plan_md mislukt**: log error in review_log, ga door met review — niet fataal.
- **Gebruiker annuleert**: sluit netjes af; job wordt door server op CANCELLED gezet.
- **Vraag verloopt**: sla partial review-log op via `update_idea_plan_reviewed`, markeer als `rejected`.
## Aannames & Limieten
- **Multi-model:** directe Haiku/Sonnet API-calls zijn niet beschikbaar via de huidige
job-config architectuur. Alle rondes draaien op het geconfigureerde Opus model.
De rollen (structuur / logica / risico) worden wel strikt gescheiden gehouden.
Toekomst: directe model-switching via Anthropic API.
- Plan bevat geen versleutelde data (review-log opgeslagen als JSON in DB).
- Repo is leesbaar; geen network-fouts verwacht.
- Max 2 extra review-rondes buiten de initiële 3 (max 5 rondes totaal).
- Per ronde: max 10 issues gelogd (overige → samenvatting in `summary`).

View file

@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
// MCP authoring tool: create een Story onder een bestaande PBI.
//
// product_id wordt afgeleid uit de PBI (denormalized FK conform CLAUDE.md
// convention — nooit vertrouwen op client-input). status='OPEN' default;
// landt in de Product Backlog, niet auto in een sprint.
// convention — nooit vertrouwen op client-input). Zonder sprint_id is
// status='OPEN' en landt de story in de Product Backlog; mét sprint_id
// wordt de story direct aan die sprint gekoppeld (status='IN_SPRINT').
import { z } from 'zod'
import type { McpServer } from '@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/server/mcp.js'
@ -46,75 +47,108 @@ const inputSchema = z.object({
acceptance_criteria: z.string().max(4000).optional(),
priority: z.number().int().min(1).max(4),
sort_order: z.number().optional(),
// Optionele sprint-koppeling: bij creatie de story direct aan een sprint
// hangen (status=IN_SPRINT). De sprint moet bij hetzelfde product horen.
sprint_id: z.string().min(1).optional(),
})
export async function handleCreateStory(
{
pbi_id,
title,
description,
acceptance_criteria,
priority,
sort_order,
sprint_id,
}: z.infer<typeof inputSchema>,
) {
return withToolErrors(async () => {
const auth = await requireWriteAccess()
const pbi = await prisma.pbi.findUnique({
where: { id: pbi_id },
select: { product_id: true },
})
if (!pbi) return toolError(`PBI ${pbi_id} not found`)
if (!(await userCanAccessProduct(pbi.product_id, auth.userId))) {
return toolError(`PBI ${pbi_id} not accessible`)
}
// Optionele sprint-koppeling: valideer dat de sprint bestaat én bij
// hetzelfde product hoort — voorkomt een cross-product koppeling.
if (sprint_id !== undefined) {
const sprint = await prisma.sprint.findUnique({
where: { id: sprint_id },
select: { product_id: true },
})
if (!sprint) return toolError(`Sprint ${sprint_id} not found`)
if (sprint.product_id !== pbi.product_id) {
return toolError(
`Sprint ${sprint_id} belongs to a different product than PBI ${pbi_id}`,
)
}
}
let resolvedSortOrder = sort_order
if (resolvedSortOrder === undefined) {
const last = await prisma.story.findFirst({
where: { pbi_id, priority },
orderBy: { sort_order: 'desc' },
select: { sort_order: true },
})
resolvedSortOrder = (last?.sort_order ?? 0) + 1.0
}
let lastError: unknown
for (let attempt = 0; attempt < MAX_CODE_ATTEMPTS; attempt++) {
const code = await generateNextStoryCode(pbi.product_id)
try {
const story = await prisma.story.create({
data: {
pbi_id,
product_id: pbi.product_id, // denormalized uit DB-parent, niet uit input
sprint_id: sprint_id ?? null,
code,
title,
description: description ?? null,
acceptance_criteria: acceptance_criteria ?? null,
priority,
sort_order: resolvedSortOrder,
status: sprint_id ? 'IN_SPRINT' : 'OPEN',
},
select: {
id: true,
code: true,
title: true,
description: true,
acceptance_criteria: true,
priority: true,
sort_order: true,
status: true,
sprint_id: true,
created_at: true,
},
})
return toolJson(story)
} catch (e) {
if (isCodeUniqueConflict(e)) { lastError = e; continue }
throw e
}
}
throw lastError ?? new Error('Kon geen unieke Story-code genereren')
})
}
export function registerCreateStoryTool(server: McpServer) {
server.registerTool(
'create_story',
{
title: 'Create story',
description:
'Add a story under an existing PBI. Status defaults to OPEN (lands in product backlog, not in a sprint). Sort_order auto-set to last+1 within the PBI/priority group if not provided. Forbidden for demo accounts.',
'Add a story under an existing PBI. Optionally link it to a sprint via sprint_id — when given, the story is created with status=IN_SPRINT and the sprint must belong to the same product as the PBI; otherwise status=OPEN and the story lands in the product backlog. Sort_order auto-set to last+1 within the PBI/priority group if not provided. Forbidden for demo accounts.',
inputSchema,
},
async ({ pbi_id, title, description, acceptance_criteria, priority, sort_order }) =>
withToolErrors(async () => {
const auth = await requireWriteAccess()
const pbi = await prisma.pbi.findUnique({
where: { id: pbi_id },
select: { product_id: true },
})
if (!pbi) return toolError(`PBI ${pbi_id} not found`)
if (!(await userCanAccessProduct(pbi.product_id, auth.userId))) {
return toolError(`PBI ${pbi_id} not accessible`)
}
let resolvedSortOrder = sort_order
if (resolvedSortOrder === undefined) {
const last = await prisma.story.findFirst({
where: { pbi_id, priority },
orderBy: { sort_order: 'desc' },
select: { sort_order: true },
})
resolvedSortOrder = (last?.sort_order ?? 0) + 1.0
}
let lastError: unknown
for (let attempt = 0; attempt < MAX_CODE_ATTEMPTS; attempt++) {
const code = await generateNextStoryCode(pbi.product_id)
try {
const story = await prisma.story.create({
data: {
pbi_id,
product_id: pbi.product_id, // denormalized uit DB-parent, niet uit input
code,
title,
description: description ?? null,
acceptance_criteria: acceptance_criteria ?? null,
priority,
sort_order: resolvedSortOrder,
status: 'OPEN',
},
select: {
id: true,
code: true,
title: true,
description: true,
acceptance_criteria: true,
priority: true,
sort_order: true,
status: true,
created_at: true,
},
})
return toolJson(story)
} catch (e) {
if (isCodeUniqueConflict(e)) { lastError = e; continue }
throw e
}
}
throw lastError ?? new Error('Kon geen unieke Story-code genereren')
}),
handleCreateStory,
)
}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
// MCP-tool: writes the review-log result after an IDEA_REVIEW_PLAN job and
// transitions idea.status. Only an explicit approval_status='approved' moves
// the idea to PLAN_REVIEWED; anything else (rejected, pending, or omitted)
// goes to PLAN_REVIEW_FAILED — a human must then decide. The tool never
// silently approves.
//
// Called by the worker as the final step of a review-plan session.
import { z } from 'zod'
import type { McpServer } from '@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/server/mcp.js'
import { prisma } from '../prisma.js'
import { requireWriteAccess } from '../auth.js'
import { userOwnsIdea } from '../access.js'
import { toolError, toolJson, withToolErrors } from '../errors.js'
export const inputSchema = z.object({
idea_id: z.string().min(1),
review_log: z.object({}).passthrough(), // Full ReviewLog from orchestrator (JSON object)
approval_status: z
.enum(['pending', 'approved', 'rejected'] as const)
.optional(),
})
export async function handleUpdateIdeaPlanReviewed(
{ idea_id, review_log, approval_status }: z.infer<typeof inputSchema>,
) {
return withToolErrors(async () => {
const auth = await requireWriteAccess()
if (!(await userOwnsIdea(idea_id, auth.userId))) {
return toolError('Idea not found')
}
// Alleen een expliciete 'approved' brengt het idee naar PLAN_REVIEWED.
// 'rejected', 'pending' én een weggelaten approval_status betekenen
// allemaal "niet auto-goedgekeurd — mens moet beslissen" en gaan naar
// PLAN_REVIEW_FAILED. Nooit stilzwijgend goedkeuren (de vorige
// `: 'PLAN_REVIEWED'`-default deed dat wel bij pending/undefined).
const nextStatus =
approval_status === 'approved' ? 'PLAN_REVIEWED' : 'PLAN_REVIEW_FAILED'
// Log summary metrics from review_log
const logSummary = buildReviewLogSummary(review_log)
const result = await prisma.$transaction([
prisma.idea.update({
where: { id: idea_id },
data: {
plan_review_log: review_log as any,
reviewed_at: new Date(),
status: nextStatus,
},
select: { id: true, status: true, code: true },
}),
prisma.ideaLog.create({
data: {
idea_id,
type: 'PLAN_REVIEW_RESULT',
content: logSummary.summary,
metadata: {
approval_status,
convergence_status: logSummary.convergence_status,
final_score: logSummary.final_score,
rounds_completed: logSummary.rounds_completed,
},
},
}),
])
return toolJson({
ok: true,
idea: result[0],
review_log_summary: logSummary,
})
})
}
export function registerUpdateIdeaPlanReviewedTool(server: McpServer) {
server.registerTool(
'update_idea_plan_reviewed',
{
title: 'Mark plan as reviewed',
description:
'Save review-log after a plan review cycle and transition idea.status. ' +
'Only approval_status="approved" → PLAN_REVIEWED; "rejected", "pending", ' +
'or an omitted approval_status → PLAN_REVIEW_FAILED (needs manual ' +
'approval — never silently approved). Forbidden for demo accounts.',
inputSchema,
},
handleUpdateIdeaPlanReviewed,
)
}
function buildReviewLogSummary(
reviewLog: Record<string, any>,
): {
summary: string
convergence_status: string
final_score: number
rounds_completed: number
} {
const rounds = Array.isArray(reviewLog.rounds) ? reviewLog.rounds : []
const convergence = reviewLog.convergence || {}
const finalScore =
rounds.length > 0 ? rounds[rounds.length - 1].score ?? 0 : 0
const convergenceStatus =
convergence.stable_at_round !== undefined
? `stable at round ${convergence.stable_at_round}`
: convergence.final_diff_pct !== undefined
? `${convergence.final_diff_pct}% diff`
: 'pending'
const summary =
`Plan reviewed in ${rounds.length} rounds. ` +
`Convergence: ${convergenceStatus}. ` +
`Final score: ${finalScore}/100. ` +
`Status: ${reviewLog.approval?.status || 'pending'}.`
return {
summary,
convergence_status: convergenceStatus,
final_score: finalScore,
rounds_completed: rounds.length,
}
}

View file

@ -390,6 +390,32 @@ export function resolveNextAction(
return queueCount > 0 ? 'wait_for_job_again' : 'queue_empty'
}
export type JobTimestampUpdate = {
claimed_at?: Date
started_at?: Date
finished_at?: Date
}
// Bepaalt welke lifecycle-timestamps update_job_status schrijft bij een
// status-overgang. Set-once (backfill alleen als nu null) houdt de invariant
// claimed_at ≤ started_at ≤ finished_at: een job die CLAIMED → done gaat
// zonder `running`-rapport krijgt alsnog een started_at, en claimed_at
// (normaal door wait_for_job bij claim gezet) wordt nooit overschreven.
export function resolveJobTimestamps(
status: 'running' | 'done' | 'failed' | 'skipped',
current: { claimed_at: Date | null; started_at: Date | null },
now: Date = new Date(),
): JobTimestampUpdate {
const isTerminal = status === 'done' || status === 'failed' || status === 'skipped'
const update: JobTimestampUpdate = {}
if (current.claimed_at == null) update.claimed_at = now
if (current.started_at == null && (status === 'running' || isTerminal)) {
update.started_at = now
}
if (isTerminal) update.finished_at = now
return update
}
export async function maybeCreateAutoPr(opts: {
jobId: string
productId: string
@ -420,24 +446,35 @@ export async function maybeCreateAutoPr(opts: {
where: { id: taskId },
select: {
title: true,
repo_url: true,
story: { select: { id: true, code: true, title: true } },
},
})
if (!task) return null
// PBI-46 SPRINT-mode: hergebruik 1 draft-PR voor de hele SprintRun.
// Cross-repo sprints: een sprint kan taken hebben die via task.repo_url een
// ander repo targeten. PRs en branches zijn per-repo, dus een sibling-PR mag
// alleen hergebruikt worden als die sibling hetzelfde repo targette. null/leeg
// repo_url = het product-repo; twee taken zitten in dezelfde repo-bucket als
// hun (repo_url ?? null) gelijk is.
const thisRepoKey = task.repo_url ?? null
// PBI-46 SPRINT-mode: hergebruik 1 draft-PR voor de hele SprintRun (per repo).
// Mens zet 'm ready-for-review zodra de SprintRun DONE is.
if (job?.sprint_run && job.sprint_run.pr_strategy === 'SPRINT') {
const sprintSibling = await prisma.claudeJob.findFirst({
const sprintSiblings = await prisma.claudeJob.findMany({
where: {
sprint_run_id: job.sprint_run_id,
pr_url: { not: null },
id: { not: jobId },
},
select: { pr_url: true },
select: { pr_url: true, task: { select: { repo_url: true } } },
orderBy: { created_at: 'asc' },
})
if (sprintSibling?.pr_url) return sprintSibling.pr_url
const sameRepoSibling = sprintSiblings.find(
(s) => (s.task?.repo_url ?? null) === thisRepoKey,
)
if (sameRepoSibling?.pr_url) return sameRepoSibling.pr_url
// Eerste DONE in deze SprintRun → maak draft-PR aan, geen auto-merge.
const goal = job.sprint_run.sprint.sprint_goal
@ -459,17 +496,21 @@ export async function maybeCreateAutoPr(opts: {
return null
}
// STORY-mode (default of legacy): branch-per-story, sibling-tasks delen PR.
const sibling = await prisma.claudeJob.findFirst({
// STORY-mode (default of legacy): branch-per-story, sibling-tasks delen PR
// — maar alleen siblings die hetzelfde repo targeten (zie thisRepoKey).
const storySiblings = await prisma.claudeJob.findMany({
where: {
task: { story_id: task.story.id },
pr_url: { not: null },
id: { not: jobId },
},
select: { pr_url: true },
select: { pr_url: true, task: { select: { repo_url: true } } },
orderBy: { created_at: 'asc' },
})
if (sibling?.pr_url) return sibling.pr_url
const sameRepoStorySibling = storySiblings.find(
(s) => (s.task?.repo_url ?? null) === thisRepoKey,
)
if (sameRepoStorySibling?.pr_url) return sameRepoStorySibling.pr_url
const storyTitle = task.story.code ? `${task.story.code}: ${task.story.title}` : task.story.title
const body = summary
@ -554,6 +595,8 @@ export function registerUpdateJobStatusTool(server: McpServer) {
'Report progress on a claimed ClaudeJob. Allowed transitions from CLAIMED/RUNNING: ' +
'running (start), done (finished), failed (error), skipped (no-op exit). ' +
'The Bearer token must match the token that claimed the job. ' +
'Stamps started_at on running and finished_at on done/failed/skipped, and backfills ' +
'claimed_at/started_at when missing so claimed_at ≤ started_at ≤ finished_at always holds. ' +
'Before marking done: call verify_task_against_plan first — done is rejected when ' +
'verify_result is null, EMPTY (unless task.verify_only is true), or when the verify level ' +
'doesnt meet task.verify_required: ALIGNED-only is strict; ALIGNED_OR_PARTIAL accepts ' +
@ -593,6 +636,8 @@ export function registerUpdateJobStatusTool(server: McpServer) {
select: {
id: true,
status: true,
claimed_at: true,
started_at: true,
claimed_by_token_id: true,
user_id: true,
product_id: true,
@ -736,10 +781,11 @@ export function registerUpdateJobStatusTool(server: McpServer) {
where: { id: job_id },
data: {
status: dbStatus,
...(actualStatus === 'running' ? { started_at: now } : {}),
...(actualStatus === 'done' || actualStatus === 'failed' || actualStatus === 'skipped'
? { finished_at: now }
: {}),
...resolveJobTimestamps(
actualStatus,
{ claimed_at: job.claimed_at, started_at: job.started_at },
now,
),
...(branchToWrite !== undefined ? { branch: branchToWrite } : {}),
...(pushedAt !== undefined ? { pushed_at: pushedAt } : {}),
...(summary !== undefined ? { summary } : {}),

View file

@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ export async function getFullJobContext(jobId: string) {
// M12: branch on kind. Idea-jobs hebben geen task/story/pbi/sprint; ze
// hebben in plaats daarvan idea + embedded prompt_text.
if (job.kind === 'IDEA_GRILL' || job.kind === 'IDEA_MAKE_PLAN') {
if (job.kind === 'IDEA_GRILL' || job.kind === 'IDEA_MAKE_PLAN' || job.kind === 'IDEA_REVIEW_PLAN') {
if (!job.idea) return null
const { idea } = job
const { getIdeaPromptText } = await import('../lib/kind-prompts.js')
@ -569,7 +569,11 @@ export async function getFullJobContext(jobId: string) {
pbi: idea.pbi,
repo_url: job.product.repo_url,
prompt_text: getIdeaPromptText(job.kind),
branch_suggestion: `feat/idea-${idea.code.toLowerCase()}-${job.kind === 'IDEA_GRILL' ? 'grill' : 'plan'}`,
branch_suggestion: `feat/idea-${idea.code.toLowerCase()}-${(() => {
if (job.kind === 'IDEA_GRILL') return 'grill'
if (job.kind === 'IDEA_REVIEW_PLAN') return 'review'
return 'plan'
})()}`,
product_worktrees: worktrees.map((w) => ({
product_id: w.productId,
worktree_path: w.worktreePath,

2
vendor/scrum4me vendored

@ -1 +1 @@
Subproject commit 3c773421dacaf506bf35a8270249822cf509ccf3
Subproject commit 7bb252c528d810584bcb46a56cff3d26ebf392ff